38°
“Our goal is to build a new culture of service from the local level up,” said Heather Taylor, one of the movers and shakers in the Metuchen-based grass-roots group. “We do this by offering free online classes to empower citizens and free local model laws for citizens to present in to their town council.”
The group actually began nearly a decade ago, after a firm with no prior experience in conducting auto emissions testing scored a $400 million dollar municipal contract, based largely on political contributions. The firm ended up costing the municipality $100 million on overruns — and got a group of concerned citizens thinking about changing public policy at the grass-roots level.
“The model pay-to-play reform law was designed to sever the link between political contributions and the awarding of government contracts,” Taylor explained.
“Specifically, the law limits donations from firms seeking no-bid contracts from contributing in excess of $2500 in the year prior to receiving a no bid contract. Firms which enter in a contract are banned from making contributions through the duration of the contract.
“The penalty for making a contribution in violation of the law is breach of contract. Attempts to circumvent the law, or “wheel” political contributions, could result in breach and a ban on future contracts for 4 years.
Dumont is a prime candidate for change. Local contractors have made large campaign contributions to a variety of political committees in the town and statewide — and have, in return, received government work.
“Absent state regulations, this is perfectly legal, but [it] raises concerns among the public,” Taylor said.
Last week, the Ctizens Committee teamed up with the Bergen Grassroots group to give the Dumont Council a copy of its model ordinance.
Council members, in turn, dropped it onto an “Ordinance Subcommittee” for review.
Taylor said she and Paul Eisenman of Bergen Grassroots met with the subcommittee, whose members are “committed to passing an ordinance, and in a timely fashion,” she said.
Still, although the constitutionally solid model has a proven track record, concerns arose that the council might lean toward a weaker pay-to-play ordinance that carves out exemptions or provides for large campaign contributions.
If Dumont adopts the proven plan, it’ll make nearly six dozen local towns in New Jersey with strong anti pay-to-play laws, in addition to what’s considered the strongest state-level law in the nation.
Before you get too excited, be mindful: Taylor says committee members in Dumont haven’t reported back yet.
Stay tuned.
DRAFT COPY OF THE ANTI PAY-TO-PLAY ORDINANCE:
Be it Ordained by the Mayor and Council of _____________, County of ______________, and State of New Jersey, as follows.
Preamble
WHEREAS, professional business entities are exempt from public bidding requirements, and
WHEREAS, it has become common for professional business entities to make substantial political contributions to the election campaigns of the local government elected officers who are ultimately responsible for awarding professional service contracts or other contracts or agreements which are not subject to public bidding; and
WHEREAS, substantial local political contributions from professionals receiving discretionary contracts from the elected officials who receive such contributions raise reasonable concerns on the part of taxpayers as to their trust in the process of local government, if not the quality or cost of services received, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to P.L.2005, c.271, a municipality is authorized to adopt by ordinance measures limiting the awarding of public contracts to business entities that have made political contributions and limiting the contributions that the holders of a contract can make during the term of a contract; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to NJSA 40A: 11-5 and NJSA 40:48-2, municipalities have the right to establish rules and procedures for contracting with professional business entities,
THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the policy of (Municipality) will be to set maximum amounts that professional business entities may contribute politically beyond which they become ineligible to receive a public professional service contract from (Municipality).
Section 1: Prohibition on Awarding Public Contracts to Certain Contributors
1. Any other provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding, the municipality or any of its purchasing agents or agencies or those of its independent authorities, as the case may be, shall not enter into an agreement or otherwise contract to procure professional, banking, insurance coverage services or any other consulting services, including those awarded pursuant to a “fair and open” process, from any professional business entity, if that entity has solicited or made any contribution of money, or pledge of a contribution, including in-kind contributions, to any (Municipality) municipal candidate or holder of the public office having ultimate responsibility for the award of the contract, or campaign committee supporting such candidate or officeholder, or to any (Municipality) or (County) party committee, or to any political action committee (PAC) that regularly engages in, or who’s primary purpose is the support of municipal elections and/or municipal parties in excess of the thresholds specified in subsection (d) within one calendar year immediately preceding the date of the contract or agreement.
2. No professional business entity which enters into negotiations for, or agrees to, any contract or agreement with the municipality or any department or agency thereof or of its independent authorities for the rendition of professional, banking or insurance coverage services or any other consulting services, including those awarded pursuant to a “fair and open” process, shall solicit or make any contribution of money, or pledge of a contribution, including in-kind contributions, to any (Municipality) municipal candidate or holder of the public office having ultimate responsibility for the award of the contract, or campaign committee supporting such candidate or officeholder, or to any (Municipality) or (County) party committee, or to any political action committee (PAC) that regularly engages in, or who’s primary purpose is the support of municipal elections and/or municipal parties between the time of first communications between that business entity and the Township regarding a specific professional services agreement and the later of the termination of negotiations or the completion of the contract or agreement.
3. For purposes of this ordinance, a “professional business entity” seeking a public contract means an individual including the individual’s spouse, if any, and any child living at home; person; firm; corporation; professional corporation; partnership; organization; or association. The definition of a business entity includes all principals who own 10% or more of the equity in the corporation or business trust, partners, and officers in the aggregate employed by the entity as well as any subsidiaries directly controlled by the business entity.
4. Any individual meeting the definition of “professional business entity” under this section may annually contribute a maximum of $300 each for any purpose to any candidate, for mayor or governing body, or $300 to the (Municipality) party, or $500 to the (County) party committee, or to a PAC referenced in this ordinance, without violating subsection (a) of this section. However, any group of individuals meeting the definition of “professional business entity” under this section, including such principals, partners, and officers of the entity in the aggregate, may not annually contribute for any purpose in excess of $2,500 to all (Municipality) candidates and officeholders with ultimate responsibility for the award of the contract, and all (Municipality) or (County) political parties and PACs referenced in this ordinance combined, without violating subsection (a) of this section.
5. For purposes of this section, the office that is considered to have ultimate responsibility for the award of the contract shall be:
1. The (Municipality) Council and the Mayor of (Municipality), if the contract requires approval or appropriation from the Council.
2. The Mayor of (Municipality), if the contract requires approval of the Mayor, or if a public officer who is responsible for the award of a contract is appointed by the Mayor.
Section 2: Contributions Made Prior to the Effective Date
No contribution of money or any other thing of value, including in-kind contributions, made by a professional business entity to any municipal candidate for Mayor or Council, or municipal or county party committee or PAC referenced in this ordinance shall be deemed a violation of this section, nor shall an agreement for property, goods, or services, of any kind whatsoever, be disqualified thereby, if that contribution was made by the professional business entity prior to the effective date of this section.
Section 3: Contribution Statement by Professional Business Entity
1. Prior to awarding any contract or agreement to procure services, including banking or insurance coverage services, with any professional business entity, the township or any of its purchasing agents or agencies, as the case may be, shall receive a sworn statement from the professional business entity made under penalty of perjury that the bidder or offeror has not made a contribution in violation of Section 1 of this Act;
(b) The professional business entity shall have a continuing duty to report any violations of this Act that may occur during the negotiation or duration of a contract. The certification required under this subsection shall be made prior to entry into the contract or agreement with the township and shall be in addition to any other certifications that may be required by any other provision of law.
Section 4: Return of Excess Contributions
A professional business entity or township candidate or officeholder or municipal or county party committee or PAC referenced in this ordinance may cure a violation of Section 1 of this ordinance, if, within 30 days after the date on which the applicable ELEC Report is published, the professional business entity notifies the Township Council in writing and seeks and receives reimbursement of a contribution from the township candidate or municipal or county political party or PAC referenced in this ordinance.
Section 5: Penalty
1. It shall be a breach of the terms of the (Municipality) professional service agreement for a business entity to: (i) make or solicit a contribution in violation of this ordinance; (ii) knowingly conceal or misrepresent a contribution given or received; (iii) make or solicit contributions through intermediaries for the purpose of concealing or misrepresenting the source of the contribution; (iv) make or solicit any contribution on the condition or with the agreement that it will be contributed to a campaign committee of any candidate or holder of the public office of (Municipality); (v) engage or employ a lobbyist or consultant with the intent or understanding that such lobbyist or consultant would make or solicit any contribution, which if made or solicited by the business entity itself, would subject that entity to the restrictions of this ordinance; (vi) fund contributions made by third parties, including consultants, attorneys, family members, and employees; (vii) engage in any exchange of contributions to circumvent the intent of this ordinance; or (viii) directly or indirectly, through or by any other person or means, do any act which would subject that entity to the restrictions of this ordinance.
(b) Futhermore, any professional business entity who violates (a) ii-viii shall be disqualified from eligibility for future (Municipality) contracts for a period of four calendar years from the date of the violation.
Section 6. Severability and Effectiveness Clause:
(a) If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance.
(b) And any ordinance inconsistent with the terms of this ordinance is hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency.
Section 7. Effective Date:
This ordinance shall become effective on _________________________.
_________________________
Mayor
____________________________
Municipal Clerk
Introduced:
Adopted:
Veto or Approval:
Final Publication:
Click here to follow Daily Voice Bergenfield and receive free news updates.
